Every once in a while, I realize that some movies make enormous amounts of money despite me totally hating them or, in most cases, player-hating them sight unseen. Because, really, how hard is it for a studio to make a $50 million film, blanket-market that hell out of it for another $10 million, then make back all the money in three weekends despite abysmal critical reviews?
Such is the case for Twilight, which is one of those delicious films considered critic-proof: consider the rabid fanbase of the book and the target democratic of teenage girls. They don't give a shit what A.O. Scott or Roger Ebert thinks of the movie. (Oh wait, the film's
58% rating on Rotten Tomatoes isn't
that bad.)
So I will subject myself to Twilight. I will watch it in its entirety. And I will supplement said watching with stream-of-blogishness notes that will probably fulfill your daily quota of snark.
So--
Let us begin:
Already: Rated PG-13 for "a scene of sensuality." That won't feel creepy
at all.
One negative point: Starting with voice-over narration. All of which could be done without!
Another unfair advantage of these sort of things: Any film with half a budget can get an ASC to make any shlock look pretty. See also: Air Bud. But a counterpoint: Some DI colorist gets overzealous and dumps a bucket of chemicals on the negative. Here, everything is dyed cyan.
Ah, the old high-schools-in-movie trope: Kids constantly hanging outside. I guess I've never seen a high-school movie in Minnesota, where it's usually far too cold to linger outside during half the school year. Also: Kids being pretty much omniscient with regards to every other kid at the school.
Whoa, main character, Justin Timberlake called: He wants his plastic face-mask back. I almost didn't recognize him from his shitty-haired appearance on Leno. And I didn't know a way to possibly signify interest between characters is to have one bear the expression of looking like he's going to vomit the whole time.
I guess I should give credit for a high-school movie having a cast comprised of people who at least
look like they're of high-school age.
A random problem I have with these sort of mass-market movies: They're not bad enough to stop watching, but not good enough to pass up in favor of something else. It's like watching TV.
And the inevitable scene where the new girl completely spills her personal life to a relative stranger.
And also the vampire-movie trope that the vampires clearly look different than everyone else but they are magically above suspicion.
Strange how I know nothing about the books, but it's now a bit painful to see the stilted, stiff relation between the two leads, just counting down until they hook up or whatever with a bunch of bad dialog.
I feel bad for the filmmakers or, specifically, the location sound mixer for all these windy, wet, rainy scenes. You can pinpoint the ADR with hands over your ears.
Oh, shit, my oh-my-gawd-this-movie-doesn't-suck disbelief-suspension on hold because of the worst costumed, sepia-toned, Avid-effect flashback. And also the first terrible visible vampire attack on the boat guy.
Without being extremely creepy (credibility voided), hearing "it makes my boobs look good" in the prom-dress-buying scene is refreshing to hear in a high-school movie. After all, every other movie just assumes the whole prom = sex thing without making a valid statement about youth. (For that done properly, see also: Fast Times At Ridgemont High.)
Some really bad wacky-cam for the "Hey, you're a vampire!" scene. Just like Lord of the Rings. Then countered by a ridiculous fast-running scene and a shakily-directed "Look how strong I am!" scene. The film, thus far, succeeds at showing semi-average teenage life, but introducing proper the supernatural puts it in uncertain territory.
And, wait a second, they're in love now? And was that random pan of trees and flowers supposed to suggest they had a bunch of sex in a creepy forest?
I'm not sure whether it was a good decision or bad to save an enormous amount of tempo-derailing exposition for the middle of the movie.
PG-13
look out they're
kissing. Then a segue into a montage that reveals, if anything, the fundamental flaw of the movie: inconsistency. Inconsistency in editing and cinematography; for the latter, specifically, would be camera work. There are traditional scenes combined with bad canted-angle stuff, floaty-cam (a drunk steadicam operator?), and unmotivated camera-speed changes. One could be attributed to a bad second-unit cinematographer, but since I'm in no rush to see if there's an issue of American Cinematographer on Twilight, I'll leave it up to my imagination.
And even more inconsistency: vampire baseball. Followed by, obviously, a vampire showdown culminating in a bad West Side Story-style pose-off.
Another derailment by a momentary elevation of the staying-with-dad B-storyline.
Now comes a rather strange fork: going from a decent teenager-in-a-new-school story to a superhero-vampire mishmash.
The cyan shift doesn't work on the shift back to Phoenix. Especially when it cuts back and forth between the omnipresent cyan dye and a few exteriors with warm colors.
And then: the return of the voice-over with thirty minutes left. It would've been excusable as a bookend, but now it just seems pointlessly out of place.
Followed by a showdown in the most stereotypical setting for a climax: a room with a lot of mirrors, glass, and wood to shatter and splinter.
Times like this I always cringe when I see someone wake up in a hospital bed. These days, I can't help but think if they're insured and how much the hospital bills would cost. And, naturally, no one wants to see a movie with that because that's what people have to deal with in non-movie life.
And the final high-school-movie trope: a prom that would cost some hundreds of thousands of dollars that no high school would be able to afford.
And for whatever reason, it ends with "15 Step"?!
I guess the decent cinematography can be explained: it was done by Elliot Davis, whose best work was done with Steven Soderbergh in Out of Sight.
So, the verdict: A cinematically-bankrupt movie salvaged by the Hollywood solution of throwing a bunch of money and scraping together enough talent to make two hours pass by harmlessly enough. Sure, I could sit through a boring-but-educational Criterion movie for an alternate two hours, or, hell, now that I think of it, rewatch Out of Sight. But here's another case, like Air Bud, that, as resident film snob, I have to eat some crow and say, gee,
it wasn't that bad.